Burying as an Interment Method and Its Impact in Kenyan Urban Areas A Case Study of Lang’ata Cemetery in Nairobi

Overview
Overview

Nature did not intend that any living organism should live forever, as our current perception of sustainability 

would imply. This is why all living things must at one time naturally die. The 21st Century has seen a global

increase in mortality rates. In the urban areas, the demographic increase in population can be used to

explain the high number of deaths (United Nations [UN], 2019). The urban population in Kenya increased

from 10.3% in 1970 to 27.5% in 2019, growing at an average annual rate of 2.03% (UN, 2018; World Bank,

2018). It is estimated that the proportion of people living in urban areas in the world rose from 30% in the

1950s to 49% in 2005 and is projected to reach 61% by 2030; with Africa having the highest annual urban

population growth (UN,2006). With the increasing population, the cities can no longer effectively

accommodate the rising land demand. Our urban land is dwindling; it is characterized by shortage of space,

congestion, pollution, and so many other factors that affect human lives negatively (Obudho and Juma,

2002).

Principle Instigator
Jennifer Murigu* and Wallace Mbugua
Abstract

Governments are mandated to allocate land for public purposes regardless of the prevailing economic stimulus, and public cemeteries form one such use. Whether it is to be used or not, public health legislation, and in Kenya for instance, the Public Health Act Chapter 242 of the Laws of Kenya, dictates that any major urban area must have a cemetery. Unlike in the past when it was felt that public cemeteries were meant for the poorest of the poor and the landless, the scenario has now changed. Wealthy and influential personalities are also finding their resting place in these cemeteries. This change in practice coupled with the increase in the population as well as the high mortality rate has led to unprecedented competition for burial land in the urban areas. It is against this background that the authors sought to establish the impact of burying as an interment method. The paper set to establish the existence of other methods of interment, their impact, their level of acceptability as well as the extent of use. In order to obtain data to determine the impact of burying as an interment method, questionnaires, interviews, and observations were the tools used. Data were obtained from randomly selected residents of estates in the Lang’ata area, professionals, city residents, as well as the management of the cemetery. Key findings reveal that burying is the most expensive mode of interment in terms of land requirement and it is indeed our duty to enhance the best use for our urban land. This failure has led to several economic, environmental, and social negative implications. It is time for the government to embark on a campaign to sensitize and encourage people on the need to adopt alternatives to burial and in particular cremation.